The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:25, 4 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Thierry Brouard (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Self written promotional style autobiography by User:Thirrouard who has also posted the same to his user page. Was speedy tagged A7 but tag was removed. None of the sources referenced (such as Harper's Bazaar,Marie Claire and Vogue) actually mention the subject but presumably as he is a photographer include his photos (I say presumably as it doesn't appear to be stated anywhere in the articles). Therefore fails significant coverage. Other "references" on the page are IMDB (not a RS), youtube, facebook and instagram. Fails WP:GNG. Glen 04:39, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Photography-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 04:55, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - After a BEFORE search, I found no indication that this photographer is notable. The only things I could find were social media, and that does not count towards SIGCOV in RS. GNG and NARTIST fail. Netherzone (talk) 16:16, 27 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Wikipedia needs to do a much better job of stopping autobiographies. We maybe should have a step in the process of creating articles in which the editor affirms that they are neither the subject of the article nor have they been paid by the subject of the article. It might not stop all abuse but it would end the rare cases where people legitimately do not realize they are violating the rules of Wikipedia.John Pack Lambert (talk) 15:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete as spam. This probably could have been tagged as a G11. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 22:17, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  Was already G11'd but this was rejected as a claim of importance was made in article.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:31, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

  ​ It was tagged as an A7, not as a G11. – Lord Bolingbroke (talk) 15:13, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete If Brouard is mentioned in any of the non-primary sources at all, it is only in a photo credit. Vexations (talk) 22:24, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletions. – Netherzone (talk) 21:33, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Artists-related deletion discussions. Netherzone (talk) 21:54, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete Extraordinarily I did not do a search here. I just read the article, which makes things obvious.ThatMontrealIP (talk) 00:22, 1 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.