The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirect to Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts. Although I personally don't see this as a likely search term, the consensus here seems to be going towards a merge/redirect. Anything worth merging elsewhere is still available in the article history. Randykitty (talk) 16:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Declined PROD that isn't notable. NickGibson3900 ^Talk 01:47, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to the significantly better Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts, which has a section on "Nuclear-arms race". Threat of nuclear war between India and Pakistan has no references, while the redirect target I propose has 72 references. Cullen³²⁸ Let's discuss it 05:10, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

This is an important topic. This page should not be deleted.

Within the page itself it is evident that there is a possibility of nuclear war between India and Pakistan. Users of Wikipedia have the right to remain informed on this vital issue.

Maakhter (talk) 10:32, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please understand that while Wikipedia will record information about current events that are in the news, we are not a news site ourselves (WP:NOTNEWS), nor are we a forum to report on various different issues. We are here to inform, but in the context of an encyclopedia. The type of informing you are referring to is more appropriate for news sites, forums, blogs, and the like. There's just no real need for a separate article if it's already covered in another article. The only way you can show otherwise is to add plenty of references to show that nuclear war specifically needs its own page outside of the main article entry. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 13:58, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Which guidelines and policies were used to create following pages?

Cuban missile crisis

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cuban_missile_crisis

Cold War

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cold_War

Nuclear arms race

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_arms_race

The nuclear arms race was a competition for supremacy in nuclear warfare between the United States, the Soviet Union, and their respective allies during the Cold War.

Soviet Union–United States relations

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Soviet_Union%E2%80%93United_States_relations

Maakhter (talk) 20:36, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect to Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts per Cullen Nick-D (talk) 23:11, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Military-related deletion discussions. Nick-D (talk) 23:14, 24 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirect as above per Cullen's suggestion. Topic does not warrant a stand alone article and can be sufficiently covered at Indo-Pakistani wars and conflicts. Anotherclown (talk) 01:43, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete - This editor is simply trying to reconstruct Kashmir - the most dangerous place in the world in a more elaborate way. Kautilya3 (talk) 21:39, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:58, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 05:59, 25 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete - How come we have to create a redirect when we can simply include one or two paragraphs on any India-Pakistan relationship article. Bladesmulti (talk) 17:15, 26 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What about these pages?