The result was delete. — Nearly Headless Nick {C} 13:36, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Dating website which claims to be "Largest and most popular English-language Singles Events website in the world", which is why I bumped this from speedy A7. However this claim is unsourced and may be original research per the talk page. Kimchi.sg 03:53, 9 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
This research is original as i am writting a paper for my university on singles events and speed dating. you will note that i have also edited a couple of other pages on wiki in relation to the origins and legal complications of speed dating and singles events.
My research has led me to search through msn, yahoo and google the three major search engines on the internet all of which have confirmed that ticket4one is the largest online both in bandwidth / indexed pages and viewable members.
i have spent a lot of time researching this industry so far and have found no other website to contradict my research.— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocky4885 (talk • contribs)
ok so i have removed the title "largest in the world" to comprimise with wiki standards. However i have left the stats on the article for further researchers to establish their own conclusion.
Is this sufficiant ?— Preceding unsigned comment added by Rocky4885 (talk • contribs)
Thanks Josh but ticket4one is not a dating site or they would be listed with DATING SITES. This is relation to Singles Events! PLEASE NOTE THE DIFFERENCE IN SPELLING
Either way it may not be notable to you, But clearly the amount of members in the first nine months makes it notable for someone else.Compared to the numbers indicated for members in the social networking website list Dont you think ?
As for it being a website "a non notable one" does that mean seeing as though you want to compare numbers that we should go and delete sites such as advogato, babbello, consumating, studybreakers,vietspace and zaadz from wikipedia ?
After all the term " social networking site" is searched 50 -60 times greater then that of the term " Singles Events yet the memberships of these sites is as you like to put it "death"
PLEASE NOTE ARTICLE HAS BEEN ALTERED SINCE THIS ISSUE TO COMPLY WITH WIKI In relation to being a personal issue i believe all researchers, strive to have their work published. Otherwise our work is rendered useless
Google Search " Ticket4one articles " i have 2280 results found
Unfortunately this seems to have become a bullying war.... The only content that has been recreated has been to adhere to wikipedia guidlines / requests
for a start it is NOT my website. secondly it is not "2280 hits" they are press releaase/news articles.As i mentioned earlier to compare these results to our social networking list the following can be seen. ticket4one 2280 articles babbello 974 articles studybreakers 918 vietspace 1040
I believe 2280 is no longer a "very" small number when compared to other wikipedia content.
May i point out that the article does state " it may not have the highest amount of unique visitors.
In regards to 8minutedating, hurrydate, offlinespeeddating only one of these websites seems to have members profiles being hurrydate, To which anyone of you can compare the search results to ticket4one. It seems Ticket4one actually has approx 3 times the amount of members. (which is what the article is stating)
wow sounds like rocky4885 has rubbed some people the wrong way. or do you just have invested interests within that industry?
i have read ALL the facts submitted by rocky4885 " (which i strongly suggest some of you do) in discussion and talks all of which i cannot help but find the exact results to which this article proclaims are true. Perhaps all we need here is an edit of this article. For if we delete this article, then i can without a doubt see room for deletion on numerous websites contained within our own social networking website list— Rattlenhum (talk • contribs) has made few or no other edits outside this topic.