The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Keep as disamb page SilkTork *YES! 21:48, 14 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Tork[edit]

Tork (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Delete no indication that the subject of this unsourced one-line article is notable. Carlossuarez46 (talk) 19:52, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

We should probabally just revert it back to the redirect. It seem to be quite plasuable and it has existed as a redirect for almost 15 months.--76.71.214.47 (talk) 23:03, 7 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
  • Replace with dab per below. Cunard (talk) 20:01, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Replace with disambig page as previously stated. --Taelus (talk) 21:13, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.