The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. KTC (talk) 01:08, 6 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Touchtalent (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

• Advertisement? Is it notable? Anthony Appleyard (talk) 06:17, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, cited independant sources are about start up, which only establish it exists. Note that article creator & another major editor appear to be associated with the organisation: another self-promotional article. Nature of organisation generates a lot of hits, but didn't find anything solid.TheLongTone (talk) 23:33, 29 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - I nominated the article for a (speedy) delete a couple of days ago. The lead for the last version of the article read: "Touchtalent is one of art showcasing size for professional" and the remainder of the article consisted mainly of lists. To the author's credit, there have been significant improvements, but I did an extensive search, and found no substantial coverage of the company. Delete as non-notable. JSFarman (talk) 17:24, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 12:56, 30 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.