- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. ✗plicit 03:25, 26 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Touqiao, Jiangsu (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Neither source passes WP:VERIFY, was moved to draft in hopes of improvement, moved back without improvement. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of China-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 02:32, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- @Onel5969: WP:GEOLAND Pizza0614 (talk) 04:16, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep There are plenty of government articles and newspaper sources on the equivalent wiki article on Baidu Baike to meet WP:V and pass WP:GEOLAND. Jumpytoo Talk 06:09, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND Folly Mox (talk) 06:13, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment - then please add the sources, the current sourcing does not meet WP:VERIFY, and do nothing to show that this is indeed a legally recognized populated place, a condition of GEOLAND. Onel5969 TT me 13:48, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I added a summary source from the place's local government to show it's legally recognized and thus meets GEOLAND. Jumpytoo Talk 18:17, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. The official sources in the article are sufficient to demonstrate that the town is legally recognized, and here are more as well: [1][2]. —Mx. Granger (talk · contribs) 18:20, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep per WP:GEOLAND. The sources are sufficient for verification and there are more sources on the Internet. Sun8908 Talk 16:20, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. Sun8908 Talk 16:21, 25 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.