The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 16:37, 26 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Transatlantic Law International[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable law firm/legal service company with no coverage in reliable independent sources. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 19:52, 19 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Law-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. Jack Frost (talk) 00:14, 20 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete, agreed there is no coverage to indicate this firm is notable, and the article reads as promotional. Tacyarg (talk) 01:21, 21 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete As above, this seems highly promotional with limited RS. Those RS that are in the article contain generally rote coverage that doesn't pass WP:CORPDEPTH. Chetsford (talk) 09:04, 22 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.