The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 2 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Transparent Records[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Source searches are not providing coverage to qualify an article as per WP:CORPDEPTH. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 01:24, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Fails WP:NCORP and WP:CORPDEPTH. Note that the notability of some of the clients of the article subject does not confer notability per WP:NOTINHERITED.--SamHolt6 (talk) 05:08, 21 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Bobherry Talk Edits 13:09, 26 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete not very notable. Yes they have a number of clients but WP:CORPDEPTH is still missing. Excelse (talk) 09:57, 27 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.