The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Malcolmxl5 (talk) 20:10, 6 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Transpersonal ecology

[edit]

[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Compare to transpersonal sociology. In this instance, it looks like it is connected to only Warwick Fox and I fail to see why there should be two articles when one will suffice. The biography seems the natural place to keep this content. jps (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. jps (talk) 19:15, 29 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Support per nom. -Roxy the elfin dog . wooF 12:58, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete There doesn't seem to be enough here to warrant a stand-alone article, and the content doesn't really need to be preserved via merging. I did like Fox is important to the field according to Fox in an article by Fox., though. XOR'easter (talk) 14:26, 30 June 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Delete This sentence of the article summarizes the notability clearly: "Fox is important to the field according to Fox in an article by Fox." --mfb (talk) 03:48, 2 July 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.