The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Let's not be hasty - While it's clear that there is coverage from at least slightly reliable sources, this seems to be a case of recentism - just a passing fad. If it becomes anything larger and gets more coverage from more serious sources then I'd !vote for a keep, but if the fad dies down then I might have to reconsider. Pishcal (talk) 16:10, 15 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep I've expanded the article a lot, using some of the references above and some I've found while Googling the meme. I feel not only does the article achieve notability (which I believe it did before I expanded it), but now I think it has sufficient enough content to completely warrant its inclusion. Soulbust (talk) 21:36, 19 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.