The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. No sources. Merging not needed because it already has an entry in List of The Price Is Right pricing games EdJohnston (talk) 03:38, 12 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Triple Play (pricing game)[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No sources forthcoming for years. Precedent established through AFDs such as Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Check-Out that these are unsourced, unverifiable, and unlikely ever to have an article worth keeping. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 02:30, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Wikipedia:Existence ≠ Notability – article topic is not notable, no sources available and subject is already covered in List of The Price Is Right pricing games. No relevant results come up from Google search. Sottolacqua (talk) 16:28, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. -- • Gene93k (talk) 23:49, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Suggest merging to a list of games. Stifle (talk) 10:01, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Bah. There is a solid list of games already. The big problem, in my opinion, is that without the image things get very difficult. And of course we don't generally allow non-free images in quantity in list articles. So merge to the list of games and include the picture. Hobit (talk) 18:56, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.