The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Triplex (game)

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

There is no indication that the subject of this article meets WP:GNG. Indeed the website [1] for the game states it is still in "the market testing phase". Also note WP:COI by article originator User:Ljtsouthatx. Derek Andrews (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC) Derek Andrews (talk) 22:06, 9 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Promotional and unsourced. A search didn't find me any obviously independent coverage. Parts of wording very similar to this. If it ever becomes well known, there would be sources, and an unconnected editor would eventually create an article. Yeryry (talk) 14:07, 15 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 02:45, 11 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ks0stm ^{(T•C•G•E)} 23:34, 16 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete there are a few games with this name [2], none of them seem notable and none of them are this game. Basically per WP:N not being met. Hobit (talk) 22:11, 17 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.