The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 23 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Troll 4[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Completing nomination for IP. Jujutacular ^talk 13:37, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Contested prod. Fails WP:NFF. 69.181.249.92 (talk) 13:27, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. -- Jujutacular ^talk 13:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Delete per WP:CSD G3; obviously not a real film. Erik (talk | contribs) 14:13, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete but not speedy; Given the peculiar nature of Troll 2 & 3, this may actually be real. But even if it is, it has not yet entered production. DGG ( talk ) 18:30, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Are we only assessing articles at face value? A very easy way to see that this is a hoax is to search for Morgan Freeman and Troll 4 (which produces no results), since Freeman's involvement would be widely noted. Erik (talk | contribs) 21:08, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Prod placed on by me was contested, but not ever filming has begun. Derild 49 21 ☼ 18:38, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy delete someday there might be a Troll 4, but this Troll 4 is a blatant hoax. Andrew Lenahan - Starblind 23:33, 16 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:TOOSOON. Let this thing get some coverage and then we can readdress a possible return. But for now, it's entirely unsourced speculation. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 01:49, 18 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: "It features no trolls, it is about Dancing Dwarfs, but the Shyamalan twist is that it takes place at the same time as Troll 2," Clearly a hoax and should be speedy deleted as such. Mike Allen 03:24, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Speedy Delete: Utter nonsense. Not even a funny hoax. GreenGlass^(talk) 04:43, 19 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.