The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Im happy to restore if another reliable source emerges. Spartaz ^Humbug! 02:38, 26 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Turpentine (band)

[edit]

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails WP:NBAND, no sources cited, and the only link in the article is to their website (which is a broken link) and their bandcamp page. Searches show little coverage at all, and no coverage by reputable sources. See also: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Our Ways Back to Chaos and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Honey Births, a Salt Troupe. Jon Kolbert (talk) 19:46, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Argentina-related deletion discussions. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:56, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I've found a profile on them in Spanish from Rolling Stone. The Mighty Glen (talk) 20:57, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Do you have a link available? Jon Kolbert (talk) 21:15, 3 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jon Kolbert: I would imagine the Rolling Stone link is the same as the one already cited in the band's article. It's certainly a valid one, but I think we'd need more than just one source on the band. Richard3120 (talk) 22:20, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Richard3120: Ah, I did not see the addition to the article (it was added after the AfD was made). I agree that we need more than one source to establish notability to meet the first criterion of WP:MUSICBIO. Jon Kolbert (talk) 23:32, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:19, 11 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. The conversation seems to be heading to delete and I agree. One ref in the article which is OK but it is just a couple of hundred words. Szzuk (talk) 13:35, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Lourdes 15:06, 18 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.