The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep. Nomination withdrawn. Clear consensus that the subject passes WP:PROF. (non-admin closure) Nsk92 (talk) 10:52, 28 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Ujjwal Maulik[edit]

Ujjwal Maulik (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No demonstrated notability, only two references to a associates and citation database. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 13:02, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. With a h-index of 48 (gooogle scholar) he passes WP:NACADEMIC(1). He possibly also passes other criteria or GNG.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 13:07, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hello! My apologies if it is not customary to reply to comments on deletion discussions. From what I understood h-index alone cannot constitute a metric to determining notability. I did some quick research (in English) and found nothing in multiple reputable sources to determine significance or notability. Once again sorry if this comment is out of place! Nearlyevil665 (talk) 13:48, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

    You can comment, all is good. Agreed, h-index does require some assessment for more borderline cases, however with such a high h-index which includes publications cited over a thousand times he easily meets NACADEMIC(1). He is also a full professor and formerly head of computer science department and a fellow in various societies.--Eostrix  (^{🦉 hoot} _hoot🦉) 14:38, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:22, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep. Beyond the pass of WP:PROF#C1 indicated above, being an IEEE Fellow [1] is an immediate pass of WP:PROF#C3, given within the guideline as an explicit example of a fellowship that passes that criterion. —David Eppstein (talk) 16:42, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Needs (further) cleanup, but it's a pass of WP:PROF#C1 and C3. XOR'easter (talk) 20:09, 25 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep. A clear pass of WP:Prof#C1 at least. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:39, 25 August 2020 (UTC).[reply]
• Keep Academic h-index of 48 and IEEE felllow--Iockyrice (talk) 21:00, 26 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep, IEEE fellow meets WP:NPROF. Coolabahapple (talk) 11:54, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Clear keep under WP:PROF. -Kj cheetham (talk) 15:20, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep Time to eat the crow and admit I was wrong. Upon further inspection the subject does seem to pass notability criteria. That being said, the article needs major clean-up efforts to look encyclopedic. Nearlyevil665 (talk) 19:08, 27 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.