The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz ^talk 00:52, 29 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undaground[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This is an unnecessary disambiguation page. All of the entries are unambiguous partial-title matches. ShelfSkewed Talk 15:01, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Disambiguations-related deletion discussions. ShelfSkewed Talk 15:04, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Support per nom. --Jprg1966 ^(talk) 15:36, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete – a pointless page – a Wikipedia search on "Undaground" gives this information instantly (and up-to-date) — Hebrides (talk) 16:16, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as partial title match, which aren't dabs and aren't valid list articles. See also:
-- JHunterJ (talk) 17:20, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Comment - in their defense, few noobs know how to search using Boolean operators. Bearian (talk) 22:35, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.