The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. NW(Talk) 21:15, 8 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete. Pointless article. Somebody went to a lot of work compiling this list, but it has no significance to anyone else. --MelanieN (talk) 17:19, 1 December 2009 (UTC)MelanieN[reply]
Delete - it is very hard to imagine how this page would be used in research. Would a reader really say, "I remember a bird called a Dusky something-or-other and will look it up using the first word of its common name." That could be done from the search window. This article is like a disamb page based on first name instead of surname. Racepacket (talk) 01:11, 2 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's a pretty radical article. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jonny4026 (talk • contribs) 11:33, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete or redirect to Dusky Sound, which is the only thing on the list that could maybe be referred to as just "Dusky." Propaniac (talk) 16:54, 3 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
What? Do you never want to find various dusky animals? Jonny4026 (talk) 08:31, 4 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - I feel bad about this. It obviously took someone a lot of work to compile this list. But it's pretty much useless. WP:LIST. Lord Spongefrog,(Talk to me, or I'll eat your liver!) 10:43, 5 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.