The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Arbitrarily0 ^(talk) 01:04, 22 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Undisputed 4: King of the Ring

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I can find no info that this is a film that is in production or even in development MarnetteD | Talk 23:11, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as nominator. However, if anyone can find that this is an actual planned film rather than a "hoped for" film by the article creator I am fine with the article being kept and improved. Also I found this User talk:2011killakam#Proposed deletion of Undisputed 4: King of the Ring after I had posted this nomination - yet I could not find a previous discussion. I have not done one of these in a long time so if this needs to be moved to "2nd nomination" or if I have done anything else incorrectly please fix things as needed with my thanks. MarnetteD | Talk 23:31, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Only info available indicates it "may" get released in 2015. --‖ Ebyabe ^talk - Inspector General ‖ 18:21, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. — Frankie (talk) 16:50, 16 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No references.Deathlibrarian (talk) 11:38, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per WP:CRYSTAL. Cavarrone (talk) 21:33, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.