The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:27, 1 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Uniana[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

This topic, a Korean video game company, lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources. (?) It had no meaningful hits in a video game reliable sources custom Google search. There were no new sources from a project-wide discussion (Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Video_games#Sources_for_Japanese_companies) and no sources to crib from the frwp article. There are no worthwhile redirect targets. If someone finds more (non-English and offline) sources, please ((ping)) me. czar 17:24, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Video games-related deletion discussions. czar 17:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. czar 17:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions. czar 17:25, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Subject lacks notability and coverage in reliable sources. Meatsgains (talk) 17:49, 24 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Delete as, from how it currently seems, this is questionably solid notable. SwisterTwister talk 05:29, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.