The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was As nominator, withdrawn AFD in favour of redirect and parallel AFD. Strange Passerby (talk) 01:59, 5 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

United Parcel Service Flight 6[edit]

United Parcel Service Flight 6 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log • AfD statistics)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Notability guidelines for events state that events should only be considered notable for inclusion if they "have enduring historical significance" or "have widespread (national or international) impact". Furthermore, it notes that "routine kinds of news events (...accidents...) are usually not notable unless something further gives them additional enduring significance". "(C)overage must be significant and not in passing"; all news sources only report the accident and do not give any further context. At present moment, I'd say WP:NOTNEWS applies here. This event is not notable. The WP:EVENT guideline adds "(i)t is recommended that editors start a section about the event within an existing article on a related topic if possible"; therefore I would not be opposed to merging the article to United Parcel Service, but otherwise, delete. Strange Passerby (talk) 12:59, 4 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.