The result was no consensus. Seraphimblade Talk to me 03:12, 8 May 2023 (UTC)
[Hide this box] New to Articles for deletion (AfD)? Read these primers!
I am not entirely sure that this article meets our notability guidelines. The coverage in reliable sources seems sparse at best. I do not count the likes of salon.com among reputable sources an encyclopedia should be based upon. I struggle to find anything in national news, and what I do find hardly seems like in-depth coverage. Any input is appreciated. Surtsicna (talk) 17:53, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Source assessment table:
| ||||
Source | Independent? | Reliable? | Significant coverage? | Count source toward GNG? |
---|---|---|---|---|
United States v. Strong | |
WP:PRIMARY | WP:PRIMARY | ✘ No |
Portland Press Herald | Local news paper WP:NEWSORG | Source appears to be reliable | Article goes in depth about the case | ✔ Yes |
ABA Journal | Published by the American Bar Association | Author is a lawyer and was a former new researcher | Article is on the cases appeal | ✔ Yes |
Portland Press Herald | Local newspaper WP:RSEDITORIAL | Source appears to be reliable, the article is an editorial but it conveys facts about the case | Article is only about the case | ✘ No |
Salon | Author and publication do not have ties to the people in this case | ~ There is no consensus on the reliability of Salon. WP:SALON.COM | Article covers only the case | ~ Partial |
Sun-News | Republished from a news agency WP:NEWSORG | Short description of the case and includes facts | ~ Part of a few short strange stories | ~ Partial |
FindLaw | Author and site both do not appear to be connected to the case | ~ This one is kind of hard, this source is a blog but it's part of a news-ish organization. So I think it could honestly be either WP:NEWSBLOG or WP:USERGENERATED | Article is only about the case and is more than a passing mention | ~ Partial |
FindLaw | Author and site both do not appear to be connected to the case | ~ This one is kind of hard, this source is a blog but it's part of a news-ish organization. So I think it could honestly be either WP:NEWSBLOG or WP:USERGENERATED | Article is only about the case and is more than a passing mention | ~ Partial |
New York Daily News | Newspaper that does not appear to be connected to the case | Considered to be generally reliable as per WP:RSP | Article is primarily about this case and is more than a passing mention | ✔ Yes |
This table may not be a final or consensus view; it may summarize developing consensus, or reflect assessments of a single editor. Created using ((source assess table)). |
Dr vulpes (💬 • 📝) 23:05, 22 April 2023 (UTC)
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 23:41, 29 April 2023 (UTC)