The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep‎. Nomination withdrawn. Liz Read! Talk! 07:37, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Uranus building (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Just a building damaged in a recent earthquake. Nobody died or even was hurt (or at least our article does not say so). I doubt this has stand-alone notability, coverage seems to fail WP:SIGCOV. I recommend merging and redirecting to 2024 Hualien earthquake. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here 02:51, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment: Just leave it till the media coverage of the earthquake dies down and focuses on the next earthquake. Brudelman (talk) 03:25, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Comment: I want to know more about why it's leaning. Aren't these countries trying to make sure buildings are able to survive earthquakes? Will there be that much detail in the article you want to merge to?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:31, 7 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Can be erased after 10th May 2024. Great achievement (talk) 04:33, 8 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.