The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Redirected. So this title was redirected to another article on the album at Utopia (EP). Note the parentheses. Of the delete arguments here, WP:CRYSTAL is addressed by the fact that the album comes out tomorrow, and WP:NALBUMS is addressed by the fact that the article appears to be well-sourced. I know that the EP article was substantially less compliant with policy than the (EP) article, and that the comments here only reflect the EP version, but the redirect and the existence of a properly sourced article means we can close this out. UltraExactZZ ^Said~ Did 15:49, 18 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Utopia EP

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unsourced article about a future EP. Fails WP:CRYSTAL and WP:NALBUMS. I initially redirected this to the artist article, but another editor reverted the redirect (without an edit summary). - Mr X 04:17, 2 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Estonia-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:15, 3 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Merge and redirect. She's an up-and-comer and I'm sure the album will gain notability in the future, but for now, no need for a standalone article. – Kerαunoςcopia^◁_galaxies 01:55, 4 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Weak Keep. Kerli HAS confirmed she is going to release the album, as seen here [1], therefore it doesn't go against WP:CRYSTAL. Now WP:NALBUMS, I'm not sure, but Kerli seems to be a fairly popular artist, so I'll leave it at a weak keep. Revolution1221 (talk) 00:47, 5 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mediran (t • c) 01:35, 9 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spinning Spark 13:21, 17 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.