The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. John254 00:05, 12 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vagbhatananda Gurudevar

[edit]

Bio of religious activist. Although he may be associated with notable people, he is not notable by himself. Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:08, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hinduism-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Religion-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. —Ism schism (talk) 15:12, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep for now because he is famous. Will look around for references in due course. Tintin 15:28, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I couldn't keep the word about the references. Hopefully Priyanath's refs are sufficient for the time being. Tintin 15:28, 11 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very weak keep, waiting for Tintin to produce sources, else delete as BIO and SPAM per nom. Gorgonzola (talk) 15:38, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reply I have looked for references and was not able to find any. I hope there are other sources that I was not able to find. There are two issues that I am concerned with. What is Vagbhatananda Gurudevar famous for, and what reliable sources back up this claim to being famous? Thanks. Ism schism (talk) 15:41, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I did a keep because he is fairly well-known in Kerala as a social reformer & philosopher, and his association with Narayana Guru and author/scholar Sukumar Azhikode (the latter considers him as his guru and often talks/writes about him). Perhaps I should have looked around a bit more before commenting. I have access to a couple of encyclopaedias in Malayalam. If they don't have an entry for him, I'll have to withdraw the keep. Tintin 15:59, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Very Weak Keep References in the article but, unsure of how the verification process works for non-internet based sources. I don't see an outright statement of importance or significance though and I'm not sure whether any of the external links really apply so... Jasynnash2 (talk) 15:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Strong Keep He was notable in Kerala for fighting for civil rights and more. References include:

Peasantry and the Anti-Imperialist Struggles in Kerala

Author(s): K. K. N. Kurup

Source: Social Scientist, Vol. 16, No. 9 (Sep., 1988), pp. 35-45

Publisher: Social Scientist

Stable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/3517171

CONTRIBUTION OF BRAHMAN AN DASVAMI SIVAYOGI AND VAGBHATANANDA TO THE RENAISSANCE OF KERALA

B Sivayogi - Studies in Kerala Sanskrit Literature, 2004 - Publication Division, ::University of Calicut

Studies in Kerala Sanskrit Literature

By En. Vi. Pi Uṇittiri, University of Calicut

Published by Publication Division, University of Calicut, 2004

ISBN 9788177480665

Peasantry, Nationalism, and Social Change in India

By K. K. N. Kurup

Published by Chugh Publications, 1991

p. 126

There are many more where these came from.

Ism and tintin - please note that people who are notable for various social and religious movements are often not famous. Famous is not a requirement for notability on Wikipedia, though it may be important for People magazine, etc. ~ priyanath ^talk 16:05, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I think you'll find Ism's comment about fame was in regards to the "Keep for now because he is famous" statement by tintin. Jasynnash2 (talk) 16:11, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I see - I've just added tintin to my comment, then. Thanks. ~ priyanath ^talk 16:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Priyanath, can you expand the article a bit based on your references. I am struggling a bit because I don't have too many print sources. Tintin 16:16, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I honestly don't have time right now - I was able to find those sources very quickly and easily with Google Scholar and Google Books. Perhaps Ism or another editor would consider improving the article. Regardless, I think this AfD is well on the way to proving notability. The article should be kept on those grounds alone, whether it's improved right now or not. ~ priyanath ^talk 16:25, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Sources have been provided above. Beware of WP:BIAS AfD hero (talk) 16:36, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. Listed sources above convince me of notability. --Quartermaster (talk) 16:50, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - A very famous goodman in South India and Eelam.Pectore^talk 23:51, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.