The result was keep. No arguments for deletion aside from the nominator. The idea of merging this to Compilation album does make some sense but not enough people suggested it to slap a big purple tag on the article. Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:55, 14 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]
I can't see this being anymore than a dicdef. The article basically consists of several iterations of "It means several artists worked on the album/song/etc.", making it not only a dicdef but also a tautological one. Previous AFD in 2008 resulted in soft redirect to Wiktionary. Ten Pound Hammer • (What did I screw up now?) 18:22, 31 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Compilation album is just one fraction of what is the concept of Various Artists. What you perceive as Various Artists is close to "Now That's What I Call Music" series or "Best of.." or "10th Anniversary" type of albums. These are what you call "compilation albums". But Various artists can be just a single and not an album at all. For example there are charity SINGLES which may be done by Various Artists. For example single by US Aid for Africa, etc. How can such a Various Artists single be a compilation album? Another example are original soundtracks of films done by Various Artists. There may be 2, 3 or 10. In no way is an original soundtrack done by various artists a "compilation album". Sometimes we have various artists but only one is mentioned and we add and "Friends" (another name to Various Artists actually). The single "That's What Friends Are For" is a song by various artists, Dionne Warwick, Elton John, Gladys Knight and Stevie Wonder. But the credit is done as "Dionne & Friends". Do you actually suggest this "Dionne & Friends" single is a "compilation album" or is it a single by Various Artists? Live concerts releases in which Various Artists take part are not "compilation albums" Woodstock was an album from various live performances. Woodstock: Music from the Original Soundtrack and More. Does it mean it is a compilation? Or it is an original album? I think redirecting "Various Artists" to "compilation album" is restrictive to say the least, and worse, misleading AND inaccurate. The better way is to expand on the article as it stands now, rather than suggest a hasty delete redirect in favour of a confining limiting concept of so-called "compilation album". As for the previous Previous AFD in 2008, the dicussion was confined to 4-5 opinions and decision was made. Surely such a wide concept need much more discussion by participants before reaching a decision. The level of discussion passed there 4 years ago leaves me very dissatisfied. It is obvious the true issues and complexities were never tackled there as far as I am concerned. My hope is that this time around, a more in-depth discussion is passed before coming to a conclusion. Meanwhile I suggest more contributors try to develop the article as it stands today. werldwayd (talk) 04:20, 1 April 2012 (UTC) werldwayd (talk) 04:41, 1 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]