- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Vegetation classification. Tone 14:04, 8 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Vegetation type (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A concept in ecology. This is a dubious kind of stub created in 2014 by a now-blocked sockpuppeteer and not substantially improved since. I'm no specialist, but I get the impression that other articles such as Biome cover the concept better, making this a WP:CFORK. Really, a very basic concept in biology sourced to "Introduction to California Plant Life"? Sandstein 17:16, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Redirect to Vegetation, where this is discussed with some sources. This is an obviously notable topic that plays a role in satellite observation, climate modeling and vegetation modeling. But the nom is right, this stub doesn't really discuss the the topic well and has poor sources. Until a better article is written, readers would be better served by the discussion of vegetation type in the Vegetation article. --
((u|Mark viking)) {Talk} 17:47, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Environment-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 20:08, 1 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.