- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was merge to Plebiscito.eu. Liz Read! Talk! 23:01, 19 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Veneto Yes (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A party that took part in an unofficial local election and of which it is almost impossible to find sources. It does not seems to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Scia Della Cometa (talk) 22:00, 12 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep. Having a separate article on this minor party is clearly better, as Wikipedia's greatness is made especially by small entries like this. However, I could also accept a merger with Plebiscito.eu. Veneto Yes was the partisan arm of the former. However, every little piece of political history deserves a space in Wikipedia and, indeed, also established and traditional encyclopedias also have small entries. The passing of time makes difficult to find more sources and information in the web, but we should avoid recentism and give space also to former minor political parties. --Checco (talk) 16:00, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- "Every little piece of political history", but certain parties are not in the least part of political history. In any case, a merger with Plebiscito.eu could be a compromise solution.--Scia Della Cometa (talk) 20:51, 14 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.