The result was keep. There is no firm consensus to merge but that does appear to be a fairly likely outcome. I suggest interested editors discuss the question of a merger on the proposed target's talk page. This closure as a keep is in no way prohibitive of a merger after discussion. Shereth 15:07, 15 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]
This article, like other similar ones, does not give any context as to why its subject is notable enough for an independent article. There is no context for why it's important, and none of the material is sourced, so it can't be verified. It may well be that one day enough sourced, verifiable information will be found for such an article, but come on, add it to the main article first and fork it off at the point that becomes necessary. I'd have merged this stuff into Vercingetorix, but there's nothing to merge, as it's all unsourced. Cúchullain t/c 14:06, 8 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]