The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. The nominator, Davey2010, thinks it might be the case that tabloid sources cannot be used, however, our official guideline, Wikipedia:Identifying reliable sources, does not say that. Davey may be thinking of the essay Wikipedia:Potentially unreliable sources, but even that does not say do not use them. It merely says that they "should be used with caution, especially if they are making sensational claims." From Davey's later comments, I am taking it that he no longer supports deletion, even though he has not offered a bolded !vote. SpinningSpark 19:10, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Vincenzo Pellegrino (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non notable actor, Can't find any evidence of notability, Fails NACTOR & GNG –Davey2010Talk 18:39, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. North America1000 20:28, 5 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 02:45, 12 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not gonna lie the list of things they've been in is impressive however they've been in 26 TV programmes/films yet there's barely nothing to confirm any of it (found a few mentions but nothing substantial), As they were born in the 60s/70s I don't expect sources to be amazing etc etc however I do expect a bit more than just a few mentions, As with any other AFD I have no issues at all with redirecting or ofcourse if you can find anything substantial I'd be more than happy to Withdraw. –Davey2010Talk 15:03, 16 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:18, 19 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]
  • Hi E.M.Gregory, I couldn't tell you where or when but I recall someone somewhere saying that a few tabloid newspapers shouldn't be used, If these can indeed be used I would happily use them but as far as I know these couldn't or atleast shouldn't be used?, Anyway I'll ask at the help desk now, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 16:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
So, I ran a proquest search, in addition to the 3 TV series, he's done quite a bit of stage work, here (TRUST NO-ONE Which former soap star is telling the truth in this mystery?, Beacom, Brian. Evening Times [Glasgow (UK)] 28 July 2005: 16.[2] ) for example, is an article about a play he's, Framed!, based on a Malcolm Rose thriller, that describes him as a "soap star) and references both Casualty & Where The Heart Is. Quite a lot of stories came up, actually, I scanned the listings and there seemed to be more than enough to put a pretty good article together.E.M.Gregory (talk) 17:13, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
E.M.Gregory - Wait sorry I wasn't saying the source you provided was a two-bit mention - I was meaning as an overall thing - The source you provided is perfect, Ah I can't access that one as I need a proquest account (and it doesn't seem to recognise "English Wikipedia" as an Institution lol ... You can't blame me for trying! :), Anyway thanks for providing those 2 sources, I've asked at the Help Desk so if those others can be used I'll add them in, Thanks, –Davey2010Talk 17:54, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Sorry. I did get that. Just, your comment prompted me to run a Proquest search, just checking my judgment. I'll be interested to hear what editors on that board have to say about your question. Also, I have been involved in AFDs where Noms in the position you are now in iVoted keep.E.M.Gregory (talk) 18:03, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Oh right sorry, Well thank you for finding more :), One editor reckons we can use them with caution but not sure how that can work out ?, As much as I love and follow IAR I really can't use it here, Sad times!, Anyway thanks, –Davey2010Talk 18:38, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.