The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Keep(non-admin closure).Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 04:56, 26 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Virtuous (2014 film) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable film, notability is not inherited from those involved in the film BOVINEBOY2008 11:16, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. NorthAmerica¹⁰⁰⁰ 12:07, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per the following sources:

• Erik Estrada coming to Middle Georgia churches in The Telegraph (Macon, Georgia)
• Faith Lutheran to screen film with Erik Estrada in Highlands Today (edition of The Tampa Tribune)
• Christian movie showing to draw Jessica Lynch, Erik Estrada in Highlands Today
• Erik Estrada’s next faith-based movie to shoot in Rock Hill in Rock Hill Herald (Rock Hill, South Carolina)
• Virtuous film premieres at Sunset Theatre in The Courier-Tribune (Asheboro, North Carolina)
• North Etowah hosts 'Virtuous' film in The Daily Post-Athenian (Athens, Tennessee)

Thanks, Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 15:30, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per research by Erik. IE: WP:NRVE. While the nominator is correct in that notability is usually not "inherited" BUT, if such involvement brings the film significant coverage, the notability is established. Point here being Bovineboy, that no one is asserting the project is notable simply because of those involved, but rather is notable through the resulting coverage. The participants become secondary considerations to the coverage itself. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 01:28, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
  • It was the case that the article was deproded for exactly that justification. However, I do appreciate all the research provided by Erik. I am happy to withdraw this nomination. BOVINEBOY2008 07:26, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
    • For what it's worth, I found these sources by choosing "Past year" in Google's search tools when searching for keywords for the film. One can choose that or a date range to focus on a certain period during which a film may have been covered. Erik (talk | contrib) ^{(ping me)} 11:29, 24 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• BIG thanks to Bovineboy for his withdrawal and to Erik for his diligent research. The 65 character (14 word) stub that was first nominated has gone through some easy changes to become so-far (with a 20x plus expansion) a 1786 character (295 word) C-class article to better serve the project. Anyone want to suggest a nice DYK?? . Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 04:08, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep per WP:HEY. I de-prodded it, as I thought that a film with this cast would likely be notable. It might turn out to be this year's Heaven's Gate, but who knows? I thought Ride Along was going to bomb, and while it got only 18 % on Rotten Tomatoes, it made lots of cash. Bearian (talk) 20:40, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

• Good catch and thanks Bearian. This now qualifies for a polite and happy speedy keep. Schmidt, ^{Michael Q.} 21:54, 25 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.