The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. MBisanz talk 14:45, 30 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Visionism[edit]

Visionism (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Non notable art movement. Deleted on pt-wiki pt:Wikipedia:Páginas para eliminar/Visionismo and fr-wiki (fr:Wikipédia:Pages à supprimer/Visionisme). I couldn't find anything on Google which could indicate some notability, no independent reliable sources: [1], only result without context. About the books, it wasn't accepted as source on pt-wiki (and the books are in portugues), basically because most of them couldn't be found and portuguese encyclopedias don't have anything about the movement. Even the creator of the movement (Luis Vieira Baptista) seems to be non-notable: [2]. Tosqueira (talk) 02:33, 26 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  • Xesko, please do not place false IDs or signatures on your comment to hide your conflict of interest. We can see by the edit history that you are pretending to be User:FRV. --Evb-wiki (talk) 00:42, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
  • I'm not placing false IDs or signatures in my comment. FRV is my signature. FRV 00:52, 29 September 2008 (UTC) —Preceding unsigned comment added by Xesko (talkcontribs) I didn't signed User:FRV I have signed FRV it's a little beet different, don't you think? Please don't do false accusations (FRV 00:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC))FRV 00:58, 29 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.