The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete --Malcolmxl5 (talk) 02:16, 28 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Visisys[edit]

Visisys (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

The article provides no real reliable info about the company; 2 sources lead to the company pages which do not contain the info mentioned in the article (and no other specific info about the company whatsoever) while the dead one is not archive.orged. I did not find any coverage, just database entries. As such the article seems to be the main PR hub of the company ;-) WikiHannibal (talk) 15:26, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. sst 15:49, 20 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:39, 25 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.