- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was keep. Ad Orientem (talk) 00:23, 1 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- VoiceoverPete (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
WP:BLP1E - a Youtuber recently banned from Fiverr. power~enwiki (π, ν) 20:15, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - His rise to fame through the Fortnite video was notable within itself, but due to the close proximity between that and the time of his ban both were lumped together. Pewdiepie and Ninja both supported him after his ban, which evidenced that he was already well known within the gaming community before is ban. He was not a low profile individual to begin with, and I do believe that he will have long term notability as he has sort of become a staple within the YouTube gaming community. Yeenosaurus (talk) 🍁 23:24, 24 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Internet-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU(T) 00:34, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep he is featured for other things in the news other than the Fiverr scandal. He passes WP:GNG as well and notability does not wear off. There should be much more of a reason to even begin to discuss a deletion. Handoto (talk) —Preceding undated comment added 00:38, 27 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- Keep - I'm generally inclined to think that the balance of evidence has to be on the side of BLP1E to justify removal of an otherwise sourced article. As I'm not confident of that, I think a Keep is the logical choice. Nosebagbear (talk) 21:53, 31 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.