The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Sandstein 17:19, 6 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Vortec IRC

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Delete. Completely non-notable software product as evidenced by the lack of non-trivial coverage from reliable third parties. Contested prod by some anon. JBsupreme (talk) 15:07, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No sources, no article. The burden is on the creator. Miami33139 (talk) 15:36, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. -- –Juliancolton | ^Talk 17:28, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, 135 Google hits. Abductive (reasoning) 19:30, 29 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Non notable software, Zero significant coverage. Triplestop x3 22:21, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Delete: I can't find significant coverage for this software. Joe Chill (talk) 23:55, 1 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Merge and Redirect to Comparison of Internet Relay Chat clients#Vortec IRC. There is nothing in the current article that can't be covered by adding a footnote to one of the existing comparison tables. If the subject is later deemed to be notable enough for a standalone article and sufficient sources indicating notability can be located it can be improved and expanded at that time. --Tothwolf (talk) 00:09, 4 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.