The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 19:40, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Vtiger CRM[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails criteria for notability GNG and WP:CORPDEPTH. Has been tagged for additional citations since July 2015. -- HighKing⁺⁺ 13:34, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as advertising with equally advertising sources. SwisterTwister talk 18:50, 17 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Zeke, the Mad Horrorist ^{(Speak quickly)} _{(Follow my trail)} 03:21, 18 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete as spam. Wikipedia is not a product brochure. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:46, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. K.e.coffman (talk) 19:51, 19 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete No source in any reliable sources. Forget WP:CORPDEPTH, some reports in sources like even PC Quest almost seemed of the click bait variety. This is an appropriate deletion candidate. Lourdes 17:38, 25 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.