The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete‎. ✗plicit 12:41, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

WFHA-LP (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Defunct low-power radio station owned by a homeowner's association of a gated community. All radio stations must meet WP:GNG, and this one does not. All sources are primary government sources and directory/program listings. First AfD was closed as keep due to assertions of the inherent notability of every radio station in the world. A RfC has subsequently rejected this. AusLondonder (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio, United States of America, and Florida. AusLondonder (talk) 10:25, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete: Yet another remnant of the looser notability "standards" of 2007 in this topic area — and most of that era's over-presumption of notability for broadcast stations was still at least somewhat present during that 2020 AfD (there's virtually no way, after the 2021 RfC the nominator alluded to that found no consensus for any looser notability guideline in this topic area than the GNG, that citing NMEDIA/BCAST would be considered policy or guideline-based today). We now require significant coverage, and directories, government records, and program affiliate lists don't fall under that category (the affiliate lists probably also wouldn't be independent, which in and of itself would take them out of contention for determining notability). WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 20:48, 20 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Ineligible for soft deletion.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 11:14, 27 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Delete: Subject does not meet the WP:GNG due to a lack of WP:SIGCOV. Let'srun (talk) 12:07, 28 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.