The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. I considered closing as redirect but really doesn't make sense as anyone searching for it would find WWE Greatest Royal Rumble anyway J04n(talk page) 14:52, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Trophy[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

No notability in the trophy Galatz ^Talk 14:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Galatz ^Talk 14:50, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Trophy was awarded to Braun Strowman after he won the 50-men Royal Rumble match. Aren't you aware of the latest events going on? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist (talk • contribs) 15:19, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- @Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist: So? What makes this trophy notable? There already is an article for the event itself at WWE Greatest Royal Rumble and the belt given with the trophy at WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship. Why on earth would we need this too? What stand alone notability does the trophy have? - Galatz ^Talk 15:21, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Whilst it could at some point become something, right now it's as important as any kayfabe "match winnings". If the trophy had some press, or had some relevence, it would be a harder delete. Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 15:37, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The trophy may not be important to you, but it is significant, and if this page is deleted, then someone else may create it again. I hope you can't put this deletion tag everywhere. And the WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship page is even created by me. User:Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist
- @Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist: I suggest you read wikipedia's guidelines for notability as you do not seem to have an understanding of them. - Galatz ^Talk 17:24, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete The event in itself is notable. The trophy is not. The argument "someone else may create it again" doesn't hold any water, as if it is recreated, and doesn't address the reasoning for deletion, it will be deleted again. It's a kayfabe award for a one-off event, and doesn't hold any significance outside it. The battle royale held every Wrestlemania has a trophy awarded to the winner. That trophy does not have it's own article, which is a very good sign that this itself is not notable enough to warrant inclusion. RickinBaltimore (talk) 17:29, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
- To tag that thought, we actually just moved the article to the battle royal over the trophy because consensus was the match was notable and not the trophy itself. And also the article could always be WP:SALTed to avoid recreation if there was an issue with recreation. I am not nominating the belt for now, I am undecided on it, because that is something that time will tell. If its carried around and used like a real belt then it has a case, but the trophy wont be, so to be this one is clear, the belt is too soon. Hamza Ahmad Wiki Scientist you might also want to read WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS and WP:ILIKEIT in your free time. - Galatz ^Talk 17:34, 1 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete The WWE Greatest Royal Rumble event and the WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship sufficiently cover this topic . - ZSJUSA
Redirect to WWE Greatest Royal Rumble. I think WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship should be grouped into this AfD and redirected as well. Neither of these are notable in their own right, and the latter is just a prize, not an actual championship. JTP ^{(talk • contribs)} 02:42, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

I've nominated that for deletion - Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship Lee Vilenski ^{(talk • contribs)} 08:55, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Delete. Also, the WWE Greatest Royal Rumble Championship is completely wrong in its treatment of the belt that was awarded. It is not a regular championship title at all. It is not listed as a current championship on the WWE website, and that's the definitive source, so I've already removed it from the navbox and list article. It's exactly like this trophy, in that it has absolutely no separate notability from the event. oknazevad (talk) 02:46, 2 May 2018 (UTC) PS NotTheFakeJTP and I had the exact same point at the exact same time.[reply]
Delete - the event was clearly notable. The trophy awarded to the winner has no independent notability -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 09:39, 2 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - It's basically the Greatest Royal Rumble version of the Andre the Giant Memorial Trophy. And as for the notability, WP:DOUBT. Also, don't flag things for deletion just because there is no notability (aka WP:ZEALOUS). Hansen Sebastian 04:34, 6 May 2018 (UTC)
- Yet the consensus was the Andre the Giant Memorial Trophy was not notable, therefore your argument makes no sense. Also WP:ZEALOUS is not an argument for lack for notability, that is why you delete things around here. - Galatz ^Talk 11:39, 6 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to WWE Greatest Royal Rumble; redirects are cheap. power~enwiki (π, ν) 19:28, 7 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Delete - no notability. Septrillion (talk) 14:04, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.