The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz Humbug! 05:50, 9 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

WWF Mayhem in Manchester

[edit]
WWF Mayhem in Manchester (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs· FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Has been a redirect for many years, which occasionally gets reconstituted back into an article. Current sourcing is poor (to be charitable). Couple of brief blurbs, couple of database listings. The best in terms of content is a blog, unfortunately. Searches turned up very little in terms of any coverage, let alone substantive in-depth coverage. Fails WP:GNG. Onel5969 TT me 17:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Wrestling-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 17:54, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions. Onel5969 TT me 17:55, 14 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United Kingdom-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:50, 15 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Edit: I've finally had a chance to more thoroughly research this topic, and I've decided on delete. This topic does not meet WP:GNG as it lacks significant coverage in reliable independent sources. Nikki311 01:48, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sandstein 22:50, 21 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment - What part of WP:EVENT? It's had no lasting effect (as pointed out by Nikki311 above), the depth of coverage by reliable sources is non-existent, it has very limited scope. Not sure how it meets EVENT. Simply saying meets a standard is not the same as showing how it meets that standard. Onel5969 TT me 18:55, 28 February 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Nikki311 01:46, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spartaz Humbug! 19:06, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.