The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Spartaz ^Humbug! 06:12, 28 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wali Khan Almuzaffar[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I doubt he meets WP:GNG for the reason cited sources are not reliable enough and there is not nothing in Pakistani RS about the subject. Saqib (talk) 06:23, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:30, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Islam-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:32, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. Happy holidays! ^{Babymissfortune} 06:33, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete - Maybe independent sources exist in Urdu language but currently nothing in my searches and creator of article should provide independent coverage. Currently, fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 10:37, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The bio exists in Urdu and Arabic language Wikipedias but the interesting thing is the bio has been created by the same user (who appears to have COI because he has not made significant contribution in any of WP outside this topic) and I don't see any reliable sources cited in corresponding Urdu and Arabic WP article and this giving me strong hint that bio is a work of self promotion by someone connected with the subject. The same user also created Council of Arabic Culture (which claims to be established by Wali Khan Almuzaffar) on English, Urdu and Arabic WP using dubious sources. Both the bio and Council of Arabic Culture articles are very promotional and should be deleted in my opinion, at least from EN WP. --Saqib (talk) 10:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I am a student of PhD & I am working on Arabic & Islamic topics. its true that my work is very limited comparing to yours but that does not mean that my work is promotional. You can give me advice to improve my EN WP contributions. Saying that my contributions are very promotional is injustice. --Ahmad.alhashimi (talk) 15:58, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Ahmad.alhashimi: You are welcome to learn the core content policies of Wikipedia at WP:CCPOL which says that any article which says that every article should be written by neutral point of view, and material must be supported by reliable, published sources. which means any material or article fails to meet the core policies, doesn't belongs here and should be deleted no matter what. --Saqib (talk) 16:24, 20 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete per nom. sami ^talk 08:34, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.