The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Per WP:SNOW. (non-admin closure) — Yash^talk stalk 05:42, 13 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Warstones Wanderers F.C.[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Non-notable football team. Plays at a low tier of the UK pyramid and does not meet the notability criteria for soccer teams at Wikipedia:WikiProject Football/Notability#Club notability. Nor does it meet WP:GNG there is little to be found beyond routine listings and occasional match reports. Nthep (talk) 15:29, 6 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep Club has played in the FA Vase, which has been agreed to be sufficient for notability purposes at numerous previous AfDs (see comments here for example). Number 5 7 10:24, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep As mentioned above, competing in the Vase is sufficient to establish notability. Smartyllama (talk) 18:15, 7 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Played as high a level 10, and in FA Vase, as per FCHD. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Nfitz (talk • contribs)
- Actually they have never played at level 10. Division One of the WMRL is level 11 (Midland Alliance level 9, WMRL Prem level 10, Division One level 11). Number 57 10:03, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
  - Noted. Nfitz (talk) 15:39, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Nfitz (talk) 05:57, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. ChrisTheDude (talk) 23:05, 8 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Keep as above, has played in a notable competition. Giant Snowman 08:04, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - per WP:NFOOTY has played in a national competition. Fenix down (talk) 15:50, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - as per stated above, and a for the fact that the article passes WP:NFOOTY. Article needs expanding, not deleting. Inter&anthro (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.