The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep with limited sourcing. Withdrawing my nomination but can be revisited later. (non-admin closure) Störm (talk) 07:49, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Wasiullah Khan[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Nothing in my searches. Fails WP:GNG. Störm (talk) 18:30, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Academics and educators-related deletion discussions. MT Train^Discuss 20:21, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Pakistan-related deletion discussions. CAPTAIN RAJU^(T) 21:26, 1 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Delete Though the subject seems to hold a notable role in a notable institution, it doesn't pass WP:GNG. I couldn't find anything from the searches to establish the subject's notability, doesn't meet WP:V. Regards, Krishna Chaitanya Velaga (talk • mail) 16:25, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep Since then, I found 5 different references including 1 from The New York Times for Wasiullah Khan and the East-West University he founded and heads. Went ahead and converted 1 existing external link to a reference and added 4 other references. The article had 1 non-working reference which I fixed during my edit. I also agree with the above comment's phrase: Though the subject seems to hold a notable role in a notable institution. The notable institution mentioned above is East-West University in Chicago....Ngrewal1 (talk) 18:27, 2 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep or merge The subject meets minimum WP:GNG rule because he has been covered in RS. However because I don't see the subject has notable career (except being the founder and chancellor of a University) and since most of the coverage is focussed on East-West University therefore I can suggest weak keep for now. One option is to merge this BLP into East-West University. --Saqib (talk) 07:23, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Merge would be better. Störm (talk) 14:38, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Illinois-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:57, 7 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 14:51, 8 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America¹⁰⁰⁰ 10:51, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Weak keep - I didn't find anything that other's haven't, but I think the limited sourcing is enough for WP:V and there is clear significance of the position. With limited sourcing, however, WP:NPOV is an issue. Smmurphy^(Talk) 16:11, 15 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]
Keep. founder and chancellor of a university is sufficient for toability, regardlesso f other weaknesses in thearticle. DGG ( talk ) 05:50, 16 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.