- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was redirect to Binance. Vanamonde (Talk) 09:39, 30 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- WazirX (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
A classic case of WP:ADMASQ. Also, it lacks WP:NPOV. - Hatchens (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. Hatchens (talk) 12:46, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 13:10, 14 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment There is not even a single sentence in the article which is not referenced with WP:RS. Regarding WP:NPOV, read WP:POVDELETION, especially the last paragraph. Even if it lacks WP:NPOV that needs editing not deletion. This company is in the news recently for both good and negative reasons. Anybody can add more information if they wish. I expected issues when created this article because it was deleted earlier, but I chose to be WP:BOLD. Since this nomination is based on 'assuming bad faith' and not on notability, I don't have anything else to add. Leaving to others. - The9Man (Talk) 13:10, 17 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Dear The9Man, you're an experienced editor with a good number of edits (as a history) under your belt. If you, yourself added a sentence - "At the point of its launch no other exchanges has this feature that helped the company to grow rapidly." [1]- which is nothing but directly contradicting the very essence of WP:NPOV. You have the right to make your assumptions and at the same time build your articles. And, so do I. Since I may make mistakes in my assumptions and to overcome this or to make it doubly sure that my tags are not affecting the pages or the editors like you - I always call for an unbiased assessment from the expert editors who have much more experience in dealing with such doubtful pages. Lately, I have done a mistake of my own in approving an article in the first place. Our job as reviewers is to learn from such mistakes and do the needful. - Hatchens (talk) 05:37, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- I personally have the market knowledge that P2P is the one thing that helped this company to grow fast at that point in time and they were the first. It is a FACT for me, supported with references.12 Could I have used better wording? Maybe. You found this is intentional promotion? OKAY. - The9Man (Talk) 15:29, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The9Man, thank you for sharing these links. The first carries a byline "Bloomberg Quint Brand Studio" , which clearly tells it's a sponsored post. And, the second link what you have shared is from Inc42 which is known for sharing promotional content like YourStory.com (which has been duly banned by Wikipedia). It may be FACT for you, but I regret to inform - your FACT is not a FACT as per the Wikipedia guidelines. Now, I have serious doubt on your capabilities of handling AfC reviews. - Hatchens (talk) 18:14, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Okay, I messed up with the first link in a hurry that I didn't see the brand part. But I don't remember that I have seen anything regarding Inc42, please lead me there.
I am not defending this anymore, and if the community feels the article is not notable, let it go. I am agreeing. Thank you. - The9Man (Talk) 19:23, 18 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Ping: Need unbiased experts' opinion on this AfD. Hence sending this ping -> @Timtrent, HighKing, Nomadicghumakkad, and GermanKity:. Let there be a "general consensus". -Hatchens (talk) 05:46, 18 August 2021 (UTC) Not a Healthy AfD Practice. In agreement with MarioGom. -Hatchens (talk) 08:27, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Please, see WP:CANVASSING. MarioGom (talk) 14:01, 23 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- MarioGom, agree with your suggestion. May be my intent is right, but yes my act can easily qualify for WP:CANVASSING. Thank you for pointing at right direction. - Hatchens (talk) 08:23, 26 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- Comment: Since it has been acquired by Binance, then it's better to be merged with it (if not deleted). - Hatchens (talk) 12:30, 19 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 13:41, 21 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The appropriate guideline is WP:NCORP. Also see WP:GHITS. If you can point to individual references that meet NCORP to establish notability, please post links. HighKing++ 13:57, 24 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.