The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to Whitlock Valley#Parks Lake and Whitlock Cienega. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 18:18, 26 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Whitlock Cienega, Arizona[edit]

Whitlock Cienega, Arizona (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I redirected after the procedural close of Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Whitlock Cienega, Arizona, but the redirect was reverted, so here we go again. Available sourcing indicates that this is probably a literal Ciénega. Redirect to Whitlock Valley#Parks Lake and Whitlock Cienega.

Pinging participants of the prior AFD: @Onel5969, Dlthewave, and RecycledPixels:. Hog Farm _Talk 15:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Geography and Arizona. Hog Farm _Talk 15:07, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Redirect per nom. This appears to be another name for the valley, not a settlement. –dlthewave ☎ 17:48, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect per Hog Farm. It's an alternate name for Whitlock Valley. RecycledPixels (talk) 22:05, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy redirect The revert of the redirect restored blatantly false information that this "is a populated place". Looking at the aerial map or topo before mass-creation wouldn't have us be here in the first place. Any historical events that happened there or the presence of a stage stop can be included at Whitlock Valley#Parks Lake and Whitlock Cienega. Reywas92^Talk 22:42, 19 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Redirect to Whitlock Valley#Parks Lake and Whitlock Cienega where it makes broader sense. Just because it technically can have a page doesn't mean it should. Star Mississippi 19:51, 20 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.