The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. ✗plicit 12:29, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Wholecoiner[edit]

Wholecoiner (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log | edits since nomination)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Uncited cryptocurrency neologism. No evidence of currency in RSes. Declined PROD - decliner cited that there was "at least one good source", but that was an Investopedia article that literally didn't mention the neologism. Closest I could find in a WP:BEFORE was Forbes India, but that turned out to be a contributor piece. Are there any RS cites for the actual neologism? Even if it passed, it seems it would be a dictionary definition and not an encyclopedia article - David Gerard (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Cryptocurrency and Finance. David Gerard (talk) 21:11, 15 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete Agree with above, saw the Forbes India piece as well, but not a good source. Nothing else found, urbandictionary isn't a source. Oaktree b (talk) 14:52, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment - This is what I identified as the good source. ~Kvng (talk) 15:54, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]
  • That could be one of the worst and most perfunctory articles I've read in a nominal WP:NEWSORG, written in five minutes from a couple of crypto blogs. Even granting it RS status, do we have anything else? - David Gerard (talk) 19:49, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

    I was not able to find anything else but I thought it would be useful to have others look before it was deleted. ~Kvng (talk) 20:53, 18 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:23, 22 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - Sufficient evidence of notability has not emerged. ~Kvng (talk) 22:25, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.