The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:09, 14 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikimania 2007

[edit]

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Ypnypn (talk) 21:21, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy Keep - Hint: if an event is covered by the New York Times, chances are that insufficient sourcing is an editorial problem rather than a notability problem. Passes GNG. Carrite (talk) 21:29, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - Upgrading all three of these to Speedy since it is patently obvious that there was not the slightest effort to follow WP:BEFORE. Carrite (talk) 21:43, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - A couple more quick refs that count to GNG to help get this over with fast: "Wikimedia's Wikimania gives Taipei City the nod," (Taipei Times). "In Taipei, Wikipedians Talk Wiki Fatigue, Wikiwars and Wiki Bucks" (NY Times). Carrite (talk) 22:08, 8 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Taiwan-related deletion discussions. Northamerica1000^(talk) 01:17, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Keep this and all Wikimania-related articles; coverage is sufficient to establish notability. hmssolent\^{You rang?} _{ship's log} 04:39, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]
Keep - does meet WP:GNG. Ansh6 6 6 05:06, 9 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.