The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
Keep There seem to be enough sources to build a good article, and the subject is notable enough for Oxford Biography, and probably notable enough for us. Gigs (talk) 20:29, 26 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep We should always cover material already in other noteworthy encyclopedia-like publications like the Oxford Dictionary of National Biography. Also, when you're not sure if someone is notable enough, you should at the very least try a Google search or make some other attempt to find out. - Mgm|(talk)09:58, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
Keep An article in ODNB, as in any other selective national biography, is definitive evidence of notability. If you like the GNG, think of it as one ultra-reliable source. DGG (talk) 22:37, 30 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.