The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep (non-admin closure). Jenks24 (talk) 03:08, 17 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

William Hope (actor)[edit]

William Hope (actor) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

An apparenly notable actor, whose BLP is totally unreferenced and seeming unreferenceable to reliable sources. Rocksanddirt (talk) 20:22, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Actors and filmmakers-related deletion discussions. -- Favonian (talk) 21:02, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Keep. References can be found with a quick Google search for "William Hope actor". --That Ole' Cheesy Dude (Talk to the hand!) 22:55, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

when i did that I found an IMDB ref (only kinda reliable), and other things that were not the actor. If you find some please add reliable sources to the article. --Rocksanddirt (talk) 22:58, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep This actor has appeared in many significant productions; meets WP:ENT. --Jezebel'sPonyo^{bons mots} 23:05, 9 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - I found and added some sources. Granted, he's not the best-known actor, but the article is sourceable. Bearian (talk) 22:21, 10 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
• Speedy procedural keep and close per the speedy keep of just [two months and] two days before this renomination. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 03:04, 12 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Erm... that was two months and two days ago ;) Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 16:03, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
    • Oops. My bad. Corrected above. Still think this AFD should be closed, as not being fixed is a reason to do so, but not to delete an improvable article because it was not done within some arbitrary deadline. Schmidt, ^{MICHAEL Q.} 19:39, 13 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.