The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. Eddie891 ^Talk _Work 11:22, 16 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Winchmore Hill Football Club (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I believe the article should be deleted because it cannot be shown to meet the WP:GNG. No reliable and independent sources are provided in the article and a Google search, while yielding many results, does not turn out any reliable third-part sources either. The article also does not meet the notability guidelines at WP:FOOTYN. According to these, a club is notable if 1) it has played at step 6 of the National League System or 2) in any of FA Cup, FA Trophy, FA Amateur Cup or FA Vase. I've had a look at comparable clubs in the same league. Polytechnic F.C., for example, has a Wikipedia article, but they are clearly notable for having played in the FA Cup of 1884–5. If no such accomplishment can be shown for Winchmore Hill, it should not be included on Wikipedia. Modussiccandi (talk) 10:15, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep I'm sorry, I made an honest mistake in assuming they had no FA Vase appearances. I'm happy to withdraw the nomination if all of you come around to keep. Modussiccandi (talk) 23:35, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Football-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of England-related deletion discussions. Spiderone 10:19, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone 10:24, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete - no evidence of notability. GiantSnowman 10:51, 9 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep per below, appears to be notable. Article needs moving to Winchmore Hill F.C. in-line with standard naming conventions. GiantSnowman 21:12, 15 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete fails the generally accepted criteria for English clubs (played at step 6 or in the FA Cup/Trophy/Vase). Number 57 12:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
  • Also, this seems to be part of a set of non-notable articles (Winchmore Hill Sports Club and Winchmore Hill Cricket Club) that should all be deleted. Number 57 12:09, 10 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
    • Keep per FA Vase appearances (three in total). Thanks to Govvy for highlighting this (I took the nom's claim re no FA Vase appearances in good faith). Should also probably ping GiantSnowman and Spiderone for reconsideration. Number 57 22:54, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Delete - doesn't meet the notability requirements for a football club Spiderone 14:41, 11 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Due to Govvy now keep Spiderone 07:36, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

• Comment A couple of things, this is an FA registered club, registered to the Kent FA pyramid, [1], they have played in the FA Vase, [2], as far as I am aware they haven't made it above level 12 in the pyramid. On a side note, I've played against them and my cousin has played for them!! heh. Cheers. Govvy (talk) 22:44, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Ping P.S @Number 57: They have played FA Vase, you might want to check that part :) Govvy (talk) 22:47, 12 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]
• Keep - looks notable to me reading FCHD. Nfitz (talk) 01:43, 13 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.