The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. Ron Ritzman (talk) 03:04, 9 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Wind, Flower, Snow (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I am nominating this page for an absence of the notability of this Kelly Chen's album. Also, no sources. I am also nominating the following related pages because of the same reasons as mentioned before:

Red (compilation) (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)

Gh87 (talk) 21:55, 18 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Albums and songs-related deletion discussions. —DOOMSDAYER520 (Talk|Contribs) 16:15, 20 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete This is a stub. The Wiki is not a list. Numerous notability problems.--User:Warrior777 (talk) 11:05, 19 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]
  • Comment, simply being a stub is not a reason to delete an article. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 12:48, 24 May 2011 (UTC).[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 25 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

• Keep - Despite the lack of sources, the presence of the album art suggests that it is a real album. In addition, the artist's article suggests that she is a fairly notable figure in the Cantopop music industry, which would make her albums notable as well. It needs sources, but it should not be deleted.--Danaman5 (talk) 11:32, 26 May 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Crisco 1492 (talk) 01:50, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

---

Note: This debate has been included in the list of Hong Kong-related deletion discussions. —Michaela den (talk) 11:14, 2 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.