The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Speedy deletion under criteria G3. Marasmusine (talk) 12:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Wofgo disc (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)

Procedural nom. Was tagged for speedy G3 with the concern that this is a hoax; there are no meaningful google hits. However, I don't think it is an obvious hoax. I can't see any mention of WOFGO at the two websites cited in the article. Marasmusine (talk) 12:04, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Speedy Delete. Text is copied from Holographic Versatile Disc. WWGB (talk) 12:07, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

  Ah, thanks for pointing that out. Marasmusine (talk) 12:14, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

• Delete. I am the user who nominated this article for speedy deletion, and I still think it should be deleted. And if it makes a difference to anyone, the search engine I used was www.yahoo.com. Hennessey, Patrick (talk) 12:12, 7 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.